Your insurer already knows what your roof looks like. Do you?
Insurers increasingly use aerial imagery to check roof condition, including at claim time. We check first, so there are no surprises left for anyone to find.
Roof condition monitoring is a yearly aerial review of your commercial building's roof, so problems like rust, ponding water or a failing patch repair are caught and fixed while they are still a maintenance job, not discovered when your insurer pulls its own imagery to argue your storm claim is really wear and tear. We run more than 1,200 of these checks a year, at no extra cost to our clients, alongside the desktop building replacement valuation we already commission for you.
For owners of commercial buildings with a roof they have not looked at. Worried about your sum insured instead?
The problem: gradual deterioration
Quick answerGradual deterioration is damage that built up slowly, rust, age, perished seals, worn flashing, rather than damage from one sudden event. Every commercial policy excludes it, because insurance is built to cover accidents, not the maintenance that comes with owning a building. The line that decides your claim is sudden versus gradual, and your insurer is trained to argue for gradual whenever it can.
Picture a storm that lifts sheeting off your roof and lets water pour into the building below. You lodge a claim. Your insurer sends an assessor, and before they even inspect the roof, they pull dated aerial imagery from before the storm. It shows rust bleeding from the fixings, water pooling in a low spot, a patch repair over a known weak point. Now the insurer has an argument: this roof was already failing. The storm did not cause the damage, it just finished off a problem that was years in the making. That argument, if it holds, can see your claim reduced or refused under the wear-and-tear or gradual deterioration exclusion that sits in every commercial property wording.
Here is the line that decides it. If the cause of the loss was a sudden, identifiable event, a storm, hail, fire, that is what your policy is built to pay for. If the cause was the building simply ageing, rust that ate through steel over five winters, seals that perished, flashing that slowly worked loose, insurers treat that as upkeep you were always going to have to fund yourself, and every commercial policy says so.
There is a fairer part of this most owners never hear about. Most wordings carry a write-back: the exclusion applies to the roof itself, but damage the failure causes to other property can still be paid. In practice, a worn-out roof that lets water in during a storm can be declined for the roof repair itself while the soaked stock, the ruined ceiling and the fitout beneath it are still covered. That split is real, and it cuts both ways, which is exactly why it matters to know where you stand before you are relying on it. We explain the full mechanics, the exact wording language, and real published determinations in How Your Roof Condition Affects Insurance Claims. For what your building policy covers more broadly, see Commercial Building Insurance.
In a published determination, the owner of a heritage building in inner Melbourne claimed after a storm on 29/01/2021 that dropped about 44mm of rain. When the dispute reached the Australian Financial Complaints Authority, the free ombudsman that settles insurance disputes, the insurer's engineer produced years of Google Street View images of the building showing the parapet mortar had been crumbling since at least 2007. The determination found the storm was the trigger and not the real cause of the damage, and the claim was declined. The insurer was directed to pay the owner $1,000 for the way the matter was handled, and nothing for the repair.
That was a home, in another state, and the same kind of exclusion sits in the commercial building wordings we place here in Queensland. Storm cover does not pay for damage that was already there.
Here is the part worth sitting with. The decay was on public display for more than a decade before it failed. It was not hidden, and it was not sudden. A neighbour had been asking the owner to get it repaired for a long time, and the determination counts that warning among the evidence it found persuasive. What was never there was a documented, expert record of the building's condition, arriving every year, of the kind an owner and an insurer both take seriously. That is the gap the roof checks from Consolidated Insurance Brokers close: someone looks at the condition of your roof every year and puts in writing what is changing, while it is still a maintenance decision and not a claims dispute.
What your insurer can see
Quick answerInsurers and their assessors increasingly review dated aerial imagery and AI-derived roof-condition analysis before they pay a claim, on top of any site inspection. They are looking for rust, ponding water, patch repairs and blocked box gutters, the signs that a problem existed before the event you are claiming for. Imagery providers market well over a hundred AI-derived property insights to the insurance industry, including roof-condition scores. Aerial imagery cuts both ways, and right now it mostly cuts against the owner who has never looked at their own roof from above.
An assessor trained to argue gradual deterioration is looking for five things, and every one of them is visible from the air, months or years before your claim is ever lodged.
- Rust and corrosion. Bleeding from fixings, laps and screw points. To an assessor, this is the clearest sign a metal roof was already failing.
- Ponding water. Standing water on a low-pitched or flat roof, and the staining it leaves behind. Ponding does not happen overnight; its presence in old imagery argues against a sudden cause.
- Missing or loose material. Tiles, sheeting or flashing already out of place before the storm you are claiming for.
- Patch or temporary repairs. A repair already sitting on the roof marks a known weak spot the owner was aware of and did not properly fix.
- Blocked or overflowing box gutters. A maintenance failure that an assessor can point to as the real cause of water ingress, not the storm.
Any one of these, found in imagery dated before your loss, is an opening for an insurer to argue the damage was gradual, not sudden. This is not a single insurer's practice; it reflects where the industry is heading generally, as imagery providers market this kind of analysis directly to insurers as a standard part of underwriting and claims review. The lesson is not to fear the imagery. It is to make sure you have looked at your own roof before your insurer does, and fixed what you find. That is precisely the service this page describes, not a promise about what any one insurer will or will not do with the imagery it holds.
Something else worth knowing, because it changes when this matters. In our experience the imagery gets read before any claim, and not by every insurer. If a policy is priced automatically and we go back to ask for a better rate, or to tell them something they should know about the building, that contact can prompt a fresh look at the whole risk. They read the property from above and from the street: general condition, where skip bins sit, and now the roof. A decline can follow, especially where ponding or rust shows up and waste sits too close to the building or its entrances. The most competitive insurers are usually the ones doing this, so the terms at risk are the best ones on the table.
You look at a bit of rust on your roof and see age. Your insurer can look at the same rust and see a reason not to pay.
In a published determination, a storm on 10/06/2021 wrecked a shed. The insurer pointed to corrosion where the steel posts met their footings, and to a weakness in the way the structure was braced, and argued the weather was not really what caused the collapse. The Australian Financial Complaints Authority, the free, independent complaints scheme that decides insurance disputes, disagreed. The wind that day was strong enough to blow parts of the shed away, and while the corrosion was real, AFCA was not persuaded it was what caused the damage. The insurer was ordered to pay the repair quote plus a 15 per cent uplift.
That claim sat under a home policy. A storm-against-wear argument on a commercial building comes down to the same question: what actually caused the damage. These disputes do not turn on who sounds more reasonable. In this one the onus sat with the insurer to show the damage was caused by something the policy excluded, and it could not. That argument is hardest to run against a record of what the roof was like before the storm arrived.
A dated record of your roof's condition, built up year after year, is that evidence. It is also the cheaper half of the story, because the same record shows you what is starting to go while it is still a repair and not a claim.
The plan: 1,200+ checks per year
Quick answerWe review your roof on Nearmap aerial imagery at the time of quote and again at every renewal, more than 1,200 checks a year across our clients. If we see a problem, we send you a Roof Condition Alert with the imagery and the specific issue we found. We tell you the exact exclusion clause an insurer would point to, so you understand your risk in plain language, and we recommend you get a roofing contractor out to fix it. Once it is remediated, that argument is off the table.
Here is the plan:
- Your roof gets reviewed on Nearmap aerial imagery at the time of quote and at every renewal, the same yearly rhythm we use to keep your desktop valuation current. We run more than 1,200 of these checks a year across our client base.
- If we find something, rust, ponding, a patch repair, a blocked box gutter, we send you a Roof Condition Alert: the imagery, plainly marked, with what we found and why it matters.
- The exact exclusion clause in your own policy wording gets referenced, so you know precisely what an insurer would point to if this went unaddressed, not a generic warning.
- You get a recommendation to engage a roofing contractor to remediate the issue, on your terms and your timeline, while it is still a maintenance job.
- Once it is fixed, the argument an insurer could have made is gone, and we note it against your file so next year's check has a clean baseline to work from.
The dates cut both ways, and this is the half that works for you. The same building is captured again and again, and comparing the passes looking straight down, so they line up properly, shows us when something changed. Rust that was there in an earlier capture and gone in a later one narrows a repair to a window. That matters, because the argument an insurer can run is that a problem was there all along. A dated record showing the roof was rusted, and then was not, is evidence of the opposite, and it belongs on your file long before anyone needs it. It also tends to be the moment an owner realises we have actually looked, rather than sent another letter.
This runs alongside, not instead of, the desktop building replacement valuation we commission at no cost to you (see Desktop Building Replacement Valuation). That desktop valuation is commissioned for our purposes as your broker, to inform the advice we give you; the roof check is part of the same annual service, at no extra cost to you.
An owner has been insured for many years and has never made a claim. Nothing has ever gone wrong, every premium has been paid, and a sense builds that the insurer owes something for that. Then the roof lets go. The question is what actually caused it, and the strongest evidence either way is what was done to look after the roof in all that time. A policy does not price loyalty, and no broker can make it do so. What helps most is a conversation that happened years earlier, in writing, while there was still time to act on it. That conversation is a large part of why this check exists, and why we would rather find something early than explain it late.
Find out what your roof looks like from the air, before your insurer does.
Roof condition monitoring runs alongside the desktop valuation we already commission for you, at no extra cost. We check first, tell you plainly what we find, and give you the chance to fix it on your own terms.
What you receive if we find something
This is what you receive if we find something on your roof. Not a phone call telling you to "keep an eye on it", but a document that shows exactly what we saw and why it matters. You see precisely what was found, on your roof, in your policy's own words, which is exactly why it is worth acting on.
The check we're not aware of any other broker doing
Quick answerWe are not aware of any other insurance broker in Australia that runs proactive roof condition checks using aerial imagery on every commercial building client, as standard, every year. Most brokers renew your policy and hope the roof holds. We look at it first.
Renewing a commercial building policy usually means one thing happens: the price gets checked. The roof, the part of the building most likely to fail and most likely to be argued over at claim time, does not get looked at again until something goes wrong. That is not a criticism of any one broker, it is simply how the industry has always worked, because most brokers do not have standing access to aerial imagery, and even fewer have built it into an annual process.
We are not aware of any other insurance broker in Australia that reviews every commercial building client's roof from the air, every year, as a standard part of the service, not an add-on you have to ask for. Insurers themselves are often surprised we already have this in hand; it is unusual for a broker to bring imagery evidence to the table rather than wait for the insurer's assessor to.
This is not a claim about outcomes. We do not promise a claim will be paid because we checked, and we never will. What we do promise is this: while most brokers renew and hope, we look, we tell you plainly what we find, and we give you the chance to fix it before an insurer ever gets the chance to argue about it.
Your remaining questions
What is gradual deterioration in a commercial roof claim?
Can my insurer really deny my roof claim because of wear and tear?
How do you check my roof?
What happens if you find a problem? Do I have to fix it?
How much does roof condition monitoring cost?
What is Nearmap?
If my roof claim is disputed, who has to prove what?
Does insurance cover a roof leak?
The information on this page is general in nature and does not take into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on it, consider whether it is appropriate for your circumstances. Where the information relates to a particular insurance product, consider the relevant Product Disclosure Statement before making a decision.
Last reviewed: 19/07/2026
Find out what your roof looks like from the air, before your insurer does.
Roof condition monitoring runs alongside the desktop valuation we already commission for you, at no extra cost. We check first, tell you plainly what we find, and give you the chance to fix it on your own terms.
Call now, most enquiries are settled in one conversation - or leave your details and we'll ring within 90 minutes on a new enquiry (8am–6pm Mon–Fri).